You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.
Henry Winsor, a medical doctor in Haverford, Pennsylvania felt that Chiropractic should be investigated ."I wonder how Chiropractors can claim such good results," he wondered.
"They claim that by 'adjusting' the fifth dorsal vertebrae, between the shoulder blades, they can relieve stomach troubles and ulcers, by 'adjusting' a lumbar vertebrae they can relieve menstrual cramps, by 'adjusting' the fifth cervical vertebrae they can correct thyroid conditions, and so on with kidney disease, constipation, heart disease, lung disease, and many other conditions, but how can they do that?
We M.D.s criticize them, but what if they really have discovered a new drugless way to treat disease?"
After graduating medical school, Dr. Winsor investigated Chiropractic and Osteopathic literature and was inspired to perform an experiment. He would dissect human and animal cadavers to see if there was a relationship between any diseased internal organs discovered on autopsy and the vertebrae associated with the nerves that went to the organs.
As Dr. Winsor wrote: "The object of these necropsies (dissections) was to determine whether any connection existed between minor curvatures of the spine on the one hand and diseased organs on the other, or whether the two were entirely independent of each other. If the Chiropractors were right in their theory, then a misaligned vertebrae that impinged a nerve going to the kidneys could weaken the kidneys and that could cause kidney diseases. If the theory was wrong, then a misalignment in the 'kidney place' of the spine would not lend any corresponding problem with the kidney organs.
The University of Pennsylvania gave Dr. Winsor permission to carry out his experiments. In a series of three studies, he dissected a total of seventy-five human and twenty-five cat cadavers. What did the necropsies reveal? Was there a relationship between diseased organs and the spinal column? The following are Dr. Winsor's results: "...221 structures other than the spine were found diseased. Of these, 212 were observed to belong to the same sympathetic nerve segments as the vertebrae in curvature. Nine diseased organs belonged to different sympathetic nerve segments from the vertebrae out of line, These figures cannot be expected to exactly coincide....for an organ may receive sympathetic nerve filaments from several spinal segments and several organs may be supplied with sympathetic nerve filaments from the same spinal segment." In other words there was nearly a 100% correlation between 'minor curvatures' of the spine and diseases of the internal organs. Let us examine some of these disease categories:
STOMACH DISEASES nine cases of stomach disease all had spinal misalignments in the mid-dorsal or thoracic spine (between the shoulder blades)
LUNG DISEASE Twenty-six cases of lung disease had spinal misalignments in the upper dorsal region, an area slightly below the neck.
LIVER DISEASE Thirteen cases of liver disease were associated with misalignments in the lower mid-dorsal region
GALLSTONES Five cases of gallstone disease associated with related spinal misalignments
PANCREAS Three cases of pancreas disease associated with related spinal misalignments
SPLEEN Eleven cases of spleen disease associated with spinal misalignments
KIDNEY Seventeen cases of kidney disease had the lower dorsal (thoracic) 10th, 11th, 12th, vertebrae out of alignment
PROSTATE AND BLADDER DISEASE Eight cases of prostate and bladder disease had the lower back vertebrae misaligned (specifically the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd lumbar vertebrae)
UTERUS two cases of uterus conditions had the second lumbar misaligned
HEART DISEASE All twenty cases of heart and pericardium conditions had the upper five thoracic vertebrae misaligned
THYMUS Two cases of thymus disease had lower neck and upper back misalignments
IN CONCLUSION - Dr. Winsor's results were published in the respected medical journal, The Medical Times, and can be found in any medical library. But Dr. Winsor was not alone in his findings for similar studies by other researchers over the next few decades would confirm his initial conclusions A WELL ALIGNED SPINAL COLUMN IS ESSENTIAL FOR A HEALTHY BODY.
So although many medical doctors are ignorant of the relationship of the spinal column to disease, the medical literature is chuck full of many experiments proving Chiropractic's theory and effectiveness.
An unhealthy spine can cause disease in many parts of the body and a Chiropractic spinal check up and adjustment can help in the care and prevention of sickness and disease.
All quotes taken from Winsor, H., Sympathetic Segmental Disturbances- 11. The Evidence of the Association in Dissected Cadaver of Visceral Disease with Vertebral Deformities of the Same Sympathetic Segments, Medical Times,49 1-7 Nov. 1921
CHIROPRACTIC TREATMENT IS EFFECTIVE, ECONOMICAL AND WIDELY USED
An economic assessment of chiropractic was conducted in Virginia in 1992 by Leonard Schifrin, Ph.D., of the College of William and Mary, that reviewed 22 studies and one government inquiry covering many years, 14 states and two foreign countries. His findings were: By every test of cost-effectiveness, the general weight of evidence shows that chiropractic provides important therapeutic benefits at an economical cost. These benefits are achieved with minimal, even negligible, impact on the costs of health insurance.Chiropractic services are widely used and appreciated by a growing segment of Americans.
A second Virginia study by David H. Dean, Ph.D., and Robert Schmidt, Ph.D., University of Virginia, compared costs of treatment of six different types of chiropractic and medical providers for treatment of 11 different health conditions. They concluded that:Chiropractors see their patients more frequently but have lower overall costs for most of the conditions considered. Chiropractic care requires fewer referrals for specialists and outside procedures. If chiropractic care is insured to the same extent as other specialties, it may result in a decrease in overall treatment costs for neuro-musculoskeletal conditions.
These two important studies have implications for the nation's need to reduce health care costs.
THE MOST COMMONLY USED CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT
A 1991 comprehensive report on a study conducted by the prestigious RAND Corporation was conducted by Paul Shekelle, MD, MPH, and internist on the faculty of UCLA. Among other important findings, the report stated that:
Spinal manipulation is the most commonly used conservative treatment for back pain supported by the most research evidence of effectiveness in terms of early results and long-term effectiveness.
This project is an ongoing joint venture of RAND, the UCLA Department of Medicine, the Consortium for Chiropractic Research, the Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research and Value Health Sciences, Inc.
The Rand panel of researchers consisted of two orthopedists, one osteopath, one internist, one family physician, three chiropractors and one health practitioner with both medical and chiropractic degrees.
MORE EFFECTIVE WITH LONGER-LASTING BENEFITS
A study conducted by Thomas Meade, MD, reported in the acclaimed British Medical Journal (1990), compared chiropractic and medical management of patients' low back pain. This was by far the most thorough trial ever performed in the field of back pain. The report stated:
Patients treated by chiropractors... almost certainly fared considerably better and maintained their improvement for at least two years.
Potential economic policy implications are that if chiropractic were fully integrated into the British health system there might be a reduction of some 290,000 days in sickness during two years, saving about 13 million pounds in output and 2.9 million pounds in social security payments.
A second study has since been published confirming the results of this research.
CHIROPRACTIC INCLUSION PROVIDES SIGNIFICANT SAVINGS
MEDSTAT is an independent study of the cost of treating many common neuro-musculoskeletal conditions conducted recently under the direction of Miron Stano, Ph.D., a health care economist and Professor at the School of Business, Oakland University, Rochester, MI.
The database developed for this study contained data on over 2 million beneficiaries in the fee-for-service sector, making it the largest known source of private-sector information on chiropractic claims payments. The database contained claims for 396,000 patients, including 93,000 chiropractic patients, with data from medical and chiropractic claims for 493 diagnostic codes.
Payment comparisons are consistent with the view that chiropractic substitutes for other forms of care. Overall, the group receiving medical treatment only, has mean insurance payments 30% higher than the group receiving both chiropractic and medical care.
|COMPARISON OF HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS RATES|
|Rate of hospital admissions (MD-DO Patient)||29%|
|Rate of hospital admissions (DC Patient)||19%|
SAFER AND MORE EFFECTIVE
A new report says that hundreds of millions of dollars can be saved by transferring management of low back pain to chiropractors. Widely known as the Manga Report after health economist Pran Manga, Ph.D., the study's conclusions are remarkable in their support of chiropractic care over traditional medical care for low back pain. In fact, the report recommends that chiropractors be consulted first, as the gatekeepers for treatment of low back pain for cost-effective treatment. Funded by the Ontario Ministry of Health, this report establishes the superiority of chiropractic spinal manipulation over the use of drugs, surgery, bed rest and various physical therapy procedures in treating low back pain. Excerpts from the report follow:
On efficacy... ...spinal manipulation applied by chiropractors is shown to be more effective than alternative treatments for low back pain.
On safety... ...the literature suggests that it (chiropractic) is not only very safe but much safer than medical and other professional management of low back pain.
On medical research... It is surprising to discover how 'unscientific' traditional medical therapies for low back pain are, and further, how slowly clinical research affects actual medical practice. Most low back surgery is not founded on evidence from randomized or even non-randomized trials.
Recommendations... In our view, the constellation of evidence offers an overwhelming case in favor of much greater use of chiropractic services for the management of low back pain... A very good case can be made for making chiropractors gatekeepers for management of low back pain in the workers' compensation system in Ontario.
Other chiropractic benefits... In our review we came across many studies that support the effectiveness of chiropractic care for headache and migraine, neck pain and referred and radiating pain, an a variety of other ailments.
CHIROPRACTIC PATIENTS RETURN TO WORK TEN TIMES SOONER AT TEN TIMES LESS COST
A 1991 study of workers' compensation claims comparing medical care to chiropractic care and reported in The Journal of Occupational Medicine found that chiropractic patients return to work ten times sooner after and injury. An interesting quote from the article was:
For the total data set, cost for care was significantly more for medical claims and compensation costs were ten-fold less for chiropractic claims.
|ICD-9 CODES||TOTAL COST
|Total cost of selected cases||$13,556||$3,716|
|Average cost per case||$2,259||$619|
This study is important because it involved 3,062 separate injury cases. The sample consisted of 40.6% of the 7,551 estimated back injury claims from the 1986 Workers' Compensation Fund of Utah.
CHIROPRACTIC PATIENTS REPORT GREATER SATISFACTION THAN MEDICAL PATIENTS
|Patient Satisfaction||Medical Patients||Chiropractic Patients|
|Very satisfied with care||22%||66%|
|Doctor seemed confident about back pain diagnosis||23%||61%|
|Feel doctor concerned about them||20%||58%|
|Experienced restricted activity for less than one week||52%||
A study reported in the March 1989 issue of the respected Western Journal of Medicine compared satisfaction of chiropractic and medical patients from Group Health Cooperative, a large Seattle HMO. Researchers there found that low back pain patients evaluated their chiropractic doctors highly in critical patient care areas while medical doctors received much lower marks. Patients generally gave chiropractors a three-to-one advantage in five important areas of satisfaction. Chiropractic patients in the study also reported quicker recoveries.